W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2011

Re: [cssom] CSSRule extensibility

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:05:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBMcosdg7+SdcX0=BOTypjfmeqXC=waNLTzMhOr5Jm6QA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Sylvain Galineau
<sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote:
> [Tab Atkins Jr.:]
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
>> wrote:
>> > [Anne van Kesteren:]
>> >> I could update the note I just added saying it is for coordination
>> >> between vendors and specifications, then remove the extensibility
>> >> section from the specification, and leave the specific details up to
>> >> the wiki page in question.
>> >>
>> >> We could then add a new section to the wiki page where we document
>> >> extensions from vendors.
>> >>
>> >> Does that work for everyone?
>> >>
>> > Sure, this *can* work. But is something that's required to ensure
>> > interop be a note linking to a wiki page ?
>>
>> Do you have a problem with the note, or the wiki page?
>>
> I care about implementation requirements being normative.

So that would be the note, then.  Anne, could you make it not a note?

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 16:06:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:45 GMT