W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2011

RE: [cssom] CSSRule extensibility

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:38:29 +0000
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3C4041FF83E1E04A986B6DC50F01782938BC9A@TK5EX14MBXC297.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

[Anne van Kesteren:]
> 
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:08:22 +0900, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
> wrote:
> > This is better than nothing but I had no idea this existed.  How about
> > a note in the spec pointing to this page?
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/cssom/#dom-cssrule-type has a note now.
> 
> 
> > Wouldn't it make more sense to have a registry of vendor-specific
> > constants on the wiki page?
> 
> I could update the note I just added saying it is for coordination between
> vendors and specifications, then remove the extensibility section from the
> specification, and leave the specific details up to the wiki page in
> question.
> 
> We could then add a new section to the wiki page where we document
> extensions from vendors.
> 
> Does that work for everyone?
> 
Sure, this *can* work. But is something that's required to ensure interop 
be a note linking to a wiki page ?

Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 15:38:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:45 GMT