- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:38:29 +0000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
[Anne van Kesteren:] > > On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:08:22 +0900, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com> > wrote: > > This is better than nothing but I had no idea this existed. How about > > a note in the spec pointing to this page? > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/cssom/#dom-cssrule-type has a note now. > > > > Wouldn't it make more sense to have a registry of vendor-specific > > constants on the wiki page? > > I could update the note I just added saying it is for coordination between > vendors and specifications, then remove the extensibility section from the > specification, and leave the specific details up to the wiki page in > question. > > We could then add a new section to the wiki page where we document > extensions from vendors. > > Does that work for everyone? > Sure, this *can* work. But is something that's required to ensure interop be a note linking to a wiki page ?
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 15:38:59 UTC