- From: Patrick Garies <w3c.www-style@patrick.garies.name>
- Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 04:44:50 -0500
- To: "Linss, Peter" <peter.linss@hp.com>
- CC: www-style@w3c.org
On 5/21/2011 6:01 PM, Linss, Peter wrote: > If you have feedback, better design ideas for the annotations, or > ideas for different data to see in the annotations, please let me > know either directly or on the list. Any help would be appreciated. Annotations Feedback: * The annotations should note the results for HTML 4 and XHTML 1.1 separately. They should also note whether testing is needed for these separately; if tests have been done via HTML 4, it's not evident that testing still needs to be done for XHTML 1.1. * It would help if the annotations could also discriminate between browser versions and release types. I don't see how the goal "quickly convey to spec readers when a feature is ready to be used" is met if Internet Explorer 10 Platform Preview 1 is given the same weight as Internet Explorer 9 for the purpose of judging Trident support. Not really sure how you would address this. * The "close all annotations" behavior of the "X" button isn't obvious. I would presume that it'd just close that one annotation box. A "Close All" or "Hide Annotations" button would be more obvious or the button could just close that one box. * If there are four boxes in an annotations box, the fourth box wraps in an ugly way. On my screen "WebKit" wraps to the next line, has no border on the left side, and the the WebKit box overlaps the "Presto" box above it. Other Feedback: * It would be nice if there was a direct way to test both HTML and XHTML at the same time. * http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/c21-pseud-link-002.htm is invalid due to an apparent XHTML-to-HTML conversion issue. -- Patrick Garies
Received on Sunday, 22 May 2011 09:45:35 UTC