- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:12:56 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: www-style <www-style@w3.org>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
On 09/17/2010 03:50 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:37:11 +0200, Paul Duffin <pduffin@volantis.com> wrote: >> What do you think? >> Is this something that would be useful? >> Does it conflict with other intended usages of () in selector syntax? > > See http://dbaron.org/log/20100424-any > > We should add this to Selectors 4 I think. Done. http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#matches Added as :matches() in place of :any(), see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0235.html I think there were some other messages on that, but can't find them atm... Also updated :not() to take the same notation. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 23:13:34 UTC