W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2011

Re: line-height limitations

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:19:02 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikQmh3x3+sxvMfp_cMk1NCDrcZYjC5uMtvmkoV0@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2011, at 4:59 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mar 16, 2011, at 1:56 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 2011/3/16 Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>:
>>>>> How about something that said not to take the glyph size and font leading
>>>>> into account at all for line box height calculation, unless it us the only
>>>>> thing on the line and needs to be an input into line-height (for em line
>>>>> height, for example). Then it could also maybe solve the problem of
>>>>> vertical-align:sup creating a big gap between two lines.
>>>> Nah, you want it to take the height of the large letter into account,
>>>> just not the nonexistent descender.
>>> You presume to know what I want?
>>> First lines are not the only lines to get messed up in spite of consistent line-heights on the whole block.
>> I presume to know what *Hyatt* wants, and your solution was
>> insufficient for that for the reason I mentioned.
>> (Also, that was a general "you", not a specific "you as in Brad".  Sorry.)
> It was my email that you replied to and said "no" to. It was insufficient for the reason I mentioned.

...yes?  You were offering up a solution to Hyatt's problem, unless I
massively misread your email.  I pointed out how your proposed
solution was insufficient to solve the problem, because it would lead
to the the line-height calculations completely ignoring the fact that
the first letter was extra-large, which means that the first letter
might be smushed up against or overlap the padding/border of the

Received on Thursday, 17 March 2011 00:19:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:44 UTC