On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Simon Montagu <smontagu@smontagu.org>wrote: > >> When the logical position of the caret could translate to more than one >> visual position, the caret is split into a left-to-right caret and >> right-to-left caret, one in each position. See attachment. >> > > OK, that's interesting. That's fine and has no bearing on the proposal to > add an attachment flag to CaretPosition. If platform-specific caret drawing > code doesn't need the attachment flag, just ignore it. As far as I understand it, split caret do need some sort of extra information to tell which one is primary, etc... but different from what you use. - RyosukeReceived on Wednesday, 29 June 2011 00:01:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:41 GMT