W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2011

Re: css3-fonts: should not dictate usage policy with respect to origin

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:17:48 -0600
Message-ID: <BANLkTikZAVvmp3PHrtMY4uif3Amh_eFQgA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
Cc: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotypeimaging.com>, Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, 3668 FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>, www-font@w3.org
All. Because that is the way the Web works today.

G.

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:06 PM, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com> wrote:

> Glenn wrote:
>
>  I believe we could agree to the first, but not to the second. In fact, we
>> want to make the second to read as:
>>
>
>        UAs MUST NOT, by default, treat webfont resources as
>>       same origin restricted.
>>
>
>  In the absence of an author declaring either a restriction or a
>> relaxation, we believe the default should be NO restriction.
>>
>
> For all resources, or for webfonts in particular?
>
> May I echo Tab's question, and ask why? I'd like to get a clearer idea of
> whether Samsung's position is essentially a matter of principle or has some
> particular practical import for UAs.
>
> JH
>
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 19:18:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:41 GMT