Brad Kemper: (a) > background-position: 20px /* image position is measured from the left > of positioning area */ > (b) > background-position: right /* image position has a "starting point" on > the right side of positioning area, and picture extends to the left*/ You've omitted that those are abbreviated forms of the property. The full form of those values is: (a) background-position: left 20px center; (b) background-position: right 0px center; The full form makes it much clearer how it behaves. You're welcome to critique the abbreviated forms of background-position as confusing, but as a separate matter from the issue I raised with linear-gradient's first parameter. Also, background-position isn't about extension or direction. It's about the anchoring of a location within the source image relative to the background-positioning-area. As such, there's not the same opportunity for confusion as for linear gradients which have both anchoring and direction.Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 07:48:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:41 GMT