RE: [css3-lists] Published as WD!

Håkon Wium Lie wrote on Wednesday, June 01, 2011 2:21 AM
> 
> But I don't think these should be predefined. Footnote marker 
> vary widely and sanctioning one specific list seems wrong. 
> The 'lower-alpha-symbolic' and 'upper-alpha-symbolic' gives a 
> slightly different result than 'lower-alpha' and 
> 'upper-alpha', but I'm not convinced this warrants predefined status.

A, B, ... AA, BB, ... AAA, BBB, ... is the alphabetic "numbering" produced by Microsoft Word.  It comes up as an issue for us in legal notices, which sometimes have long lists of actionable items, which is why I requested it.  That is, it has been a real-world issue for me.

Hope this helps,
Charles Belov
SFMTA Webmaster

Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 20:43:09 UTC