W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2011

Re: [css3-images] Features Overview

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:16:48 -0700
Message-ID: <4E308040.1080702@inkedblade.net>
To: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, www-style@w3.org, public-media-fragment@w3.org
On 07/27/2011 12:19 AM, Raphaël Troncy wrote:
> Dear Tab,
>
>> I agree that it's difficult to find a good answer. If we think the
>> problem is essentially impossible, then we should just make it
>> explicitly unsupported, not undefined.
>
> Follow-up of this thread, the Editor Draft now states (section 4.2.2),
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#naming-space:
>
> "Note that in the case of pixel-based clipping areas, application of those
> areas to multi-resolutions visual media is unsupported. More generally,
> pixel-clip an image that does not have a single well defined pixel resolution
> (width and height) is not recommended."
>
> Do you agree with this reformulation?

Define "unsupported". What does the UA do when presented with such a situation?

~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 21:17:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:42 GMT