W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2011

Re: [css3-images] 'image-fit/position' alias for 'object-fit/position' not needed

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:01:19 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=f9ORa3dq7sYFC-RqogSQMhtgYQdKR-potn9sr@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:41 AM, fantasai
<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 02:45 PM, fantasai wrote:
>>
>> On 01/27/2011 02:19 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:18 PM, fantasai<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> They weren't there for browser implementations, Tab, they
>>>> were there for printer implementations. I don't think you
>>>> should have removed that.
>>>
>>> Were they unprefixed in printers?
>>
>> They might have been. I'll have to check with HP.
>
> Yes. They were implemented unprefixed. It's likely some existing
> content depends on this, although not Web content.

All right, I'll add the note back in.

~TJ
Received on Friday, 28 January 2011 20:02:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:36 GMT