Re: [css3-images] 'image-fit/position' alias for 'object-fit/position' not needed

On 01/27/2011 02:45 PM, fantasai wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 02:19 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:18 PM, fantasai<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> They weren't there for browser implementations, Tab, they
>>> were there for printer implementations. I don't think you
>>> should have removed that.
>>
>> Were they unprefixed in printers?
>
> They might have been. I'll have to check with HP.

Yes. They were implemented unprefixed. It's likely some existing
content depends on this, although not Web content.

~fantasai

Received on Friday, 28 January 2011 19:42:17 UTC