W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2011

Re: [css3-images] 'image-fit/position' alias for 'object-fit/position' not needed

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:41:41 -0800
Message-ID: <4D431BF5.5090509@inkedblade.net>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 01/27/2011 02:45 PM, fantasai wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 02:19 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:18 PM, fantasai<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> They weren't there for browser implementations, Tab, they
>>> were there for printer implementations. I don't think you
>>> should have removed that.
>>
>> Were they unprefixed in printers?
>
> They might have been. I'll have to check with HP.

Yes. They were implemented unprefixed. It's likely some existing
content depends on this, although not Web content.

~fantasai
Received on Friday, 28 January 2011 19:42:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:36 GMT