W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2011

Re: [css3-flexbox] intuitivity and width computation rules

From: Rob Crowther <robertc@boogdesign.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:10:46 +0000
Message-ID: <4D2EC196.2070506@boogdesign.com>
To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 13/01/11 02:42, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Seems like styles like this should do it:
> #W { width: 200px; }
> .TwoFx { width: calc(0.5 * (100% - 200px)); }
> .Fx { width: calc(0.25 * (100% - 200px)); }
Thanks, I'll give that a go at some point today.

> I'm not sure I follow. You have the container already, right? So you
> could just style that as a table and the things inside as cells....
I'd always assumed you had to have an element with table-row in there, 
now I've tried it things actually work better in Opera without the extra 
wrapper, though not sure why.

> That runs us into into the various weirdness with table layout, though.
> _That_ I'm not sure most people can explain sanely, and it's definitely
> not compatible across browsers. I definitely can't explain it.
I've been struggling to find a description of what display: 
table/-row/-cell are expected to do in the specs, can anyone give me a 

Received on Thursday, 13 January 2011 09:11:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:42 UTC