W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Serializing gradient function

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:01:21 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTinHSJ6AuYw7afAfvtPcF1W_outVD0uFLgvX+1D1@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rafal Chlodnicki <rchlodnicki@opera.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Rafal Chlodnicki <rchlodnicki@opera.com> wrote:
> Given examples:
>  linear-gradient(top left, black, white)
>  linear-gradient(left top, black, white)
> if following citation from CSSOM spec again:
>  "Where multiple CSS component values can appear in any order without
> changing the meaning of the value (typically represented by a double bar ||
> in the value syntax), use the order as given in the syntax."
> both of these examples should have "linear-gradient(top left, black, white)"
> computed value as gradient syntax specifies them in that order:
>  [ [top | bottom] || [left | right] ]

Ooh, good example.  I don't think that that CSSOM clause applies,
actually (these aren't component values, they're function arguments),
but they should indeed serialize the same way.  I'll modify the
serialization algorithm to reflect that.

Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2011 18:02:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 February 2015 12:34:47 UTC