- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:08:06 -0800
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@w3.org>
- CC: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On 01/07/2011 01:19 PM, fantasai wrote: > On 01/07/2011 12:59 PM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: >> >>> So, for Manga, it looks like the item 2 of your proposal: >>>> 2. Specify the "emphasis dots overriding ruby" behavior. >>>> But this won't be forward-compatible for manga use cases, >>>> which might be implemented in SVG+CSS in the future. >>> must be the way to go, although I didn't understand what you meant by the 2nd sentence starting "but this won't be...". What >>> do you mean by "forward-compatible"? >> >> I thought that you don't want to address the "ruby with emphasis dots" issue is CSS3 (which makes sense since this is indeed >> an edge case), but then the only reasonable way to handle this is to leave it unspecified. IIRC, CSS2.1 leaves several >> situations unspecified for forward compatibility. >> >> Now that you specify it. Chances are that it will be a feature at risk :) > > The UA is allowed to draw the marks, but not required to: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/#text-emphasis-style and by "marks" I mean "both the ruby and the marks"... ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 7 January 2011 22:08:40 UTC