On 02/05/2011 10:15 AM, fantasai wrote: > On 02/05/2011 04:15 AM, Daniel Weck wrote: >> The latest editor's draft now includes a new 'speakability' property. The 'none' value of the 'speak' property has been >> removed. Note how "speakability:none" is analogous to "display:none" (the prose is near-identical). >> >> Please review [1]. > > I would suggest marking the name of the property as an issue > in case anyone has better ideas. :) I'm not too thrilled with > speakability. > > The other comment I have is that 'auto' must resolve to *computed* > values of 'none' or 'normal', otherwise it doesn't work. Sorry, a *computed* value of 'none' or 'auto', where a computed value of 'auto' resolves to a used value of 'normal'. You really have to be careful about not changing what I wrote in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0483.html because the interactions here are very tricky. 'auto' must inherit as 'none' when 'display' is 'none', and must inherit as 'auto' when it's not, otherwise this doesn't work. ~fantasaiReceived on Saturday, 5 February 2011 18:23:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:37 GMT