W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2011

RE: Unprefixed properties and modules - RE: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions Telecon 201-08-17

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:12:48 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3C4041FF83E1E04A986B6DC50F017829323DBD@TK5EX14MBXC296.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

[Tab Atkins Jr.:]
 
> (Sorry, I assumed Sylvain said something about this.)
> 
Confusion on my part between 'cannot drop prefix before CR'
and 'cannot move to CR at feature level'. My bad.

As long as an IR is submitted I am of course fine with dropping prefixes
at the feature level in CR though I expect there may be some argument
as to what a "feature" is at some point e.g. when a browser implements the 
shorthand of a property but not its longhand props or vice-versa (as Opera 
did with border-image and multiple backgrounds at one point). I guess we 
will see how well that works in practice.

Received on Friday, 19 August 2011 18:13:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:43 GMT