W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2011

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions Telecon 201-08-17

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:14:11 -0700
Message-ID: <4E4D6483.9040002@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 08/17/2011 09:04 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote:
> [fantasai:]
>>     - RESOLVED: Put ltr | rtl keywords back into image(), mark as at-risk.
> ...
>> <fantasai>  Florian, prefixes are dropped per feature, not per module.
> Don't know how I missed this; the last time I pointed out we agreed we could move
> to CR on a per-feature basis when possible you said we did not in fact agree to that,
> though we discussed it. Can you point to the decision allowing us to do this? If that
> is the case then we never needed to move anything to Level 4 on the grounds of moving
> gradient standardization forward, did we ?

We did not agree to move to CR on a per-feature basis.
We did agree to allow prefix-dropping on a per-feature basis.

Dropping prefixes != moving to CR.

Dropping prefixes requires:
   1. The feature is in CR.
   2. The implementation is correct *per CR spec*
   3. The implementation proves its correctness via tests.

It's possible for #1 to be true for features that don't satisfy all three.


Received on Thursday, 18 August 2011 19:14:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:48 UTC