W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2011

Re: [css3-images] 5.2 radial-gradient() Syntax

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:15:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDB9iA541tgQc1TjHNRvT8ioE-CYeXyubn01DLn_qfHOjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 02:32:14 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> If so, then either is valid, but I don't have to define what
>> <'background-position'> means - according to the Values module, it
>> means "whatever is accepted by the 'background-position' property".
>
> It's worth noting that although they are both valid, they are not
> equivalent, given that css3-background introduces multiple background
> layers.
>
> Though this is no longer an issue for css3-images, since the change seems to
> have been reverted.

Sorry, I accidentally responded to Brian off-list recognizing this
point, and reverted the change.

~TJ
Received on Monday, 15 August 2011 19:26:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:43 GMT