W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2011

Re: [css3-images] 5.2 radial-gradient() Syntax

From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:21:20 +0200
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.vz8z9uvybunlto@oyvinds-desktop>
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 02:32:14 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>  
> wrote:
>>        [<'background-position'>,]?
> ...
>>        [<bg-position>,]?
>
> That's the only difference, right?
>
> If so, then either is valid, but I don't have to define what
> <'background-position'> means - according to the Values module, it
> means "whatever is accepted by the 'background-position' property".

It's worth noting that although they are both valid, they are not  
equivalent, given that css3-background introduces multiple background  
layers.

Though this is no longer an issue for css3-images, since the change seems  
to have been reverted.

-- 
Øyvind Stenhaug
Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Monday, 15 August 2011 09:21:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:43 GMT