- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 07:51:34 -0700
- To: Philippe Wittenbergh <ph.wittenbergh@l-c-n.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Apr 22, 2011, at 3:01 am, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2011, at 2:16 PM, Simon Fraser wrote: > >> I think you misunderstand. Those still work. I'm saying that 'left' and 'top' >> don't apply to a statically positioned, transformed element. > > er.. yeah, reading failure on my part. Sorry about that. > > But it still feels weird that an AP child/descendant of a statically positioned transformed element uses the transformed element as its containing block. But think about the alternative; the left/top offset for the positioned descendent would cross a transform boundary (which might be a rotation), which becomes nonsensical. Simon
Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 14:52:16 UTC