On Apr 13, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote: >> I don't like the idea of width/height taking space-separated lists. I would rather have a flex function. >> >> Given a choice between flex(1,0,auto) with commas and fixed set of arguments and flex(auto 1 0) with space separated arbitrary order, I think I would clearly prefer any-order version... > > Okay, then I'll change the draft to accept the 'fr' unit and the > 'flex()' function with space-separated any-order arguments. Sound > good? I'm confused. 'flex(auto 1 0)' is the same as 'flex(auto 0 1)' or 'flex(1 auto 0)'?Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 06:15:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:39 GMT