W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2011

Re: [css3-flexbox] Best way to denote flexible lengths

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:14:56 -0700
Cc: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6F4817FC-B4C1-49FF-B5BA-81DDEB4F0EDF@gmail.com>
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>

On Apr 13, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> I don't like the idea of width/height taking space-separated lists. I would rather have a flex function.
>> 
>> Given a choice between flex(1,0,auto) with commas and fixed set of arguments and flex(auto 1 0) with space separated arbitrary order, I think I would clearly prefer any-order version...
> 
> Okay, then I'll change the draft to accept the 'fr' unit and the
> 'flex()' function with space-separated any-order arguments.  Sound
> good?

I'm confused. 'flex(auto 1 0)' is the same as 'flex(auto 0 1)' or 'flex(1 auto 0)'?
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 06:15:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:39 GMT