W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2011

Re: The Unwanted Effect of XBL Shadow DOM Elements on Layout

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 14:09:20 -0700
Message-ID: <4D9E2800.10209@mit.edu>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 4/7/11 1:31 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Boris Zbarsky<bzbarsky@mit.edu>  wrote:
>> That's quite different from the problem Lachlan is talking about.  What
>> you're saying is that the root of the shadow tree does not appear in the
>> final flattened tree at all, which is true.  What Lachlan wants is things
>> that appear in the final flattened tree but do not generate boxes of their
>> own; their children's boxes are just placed in their parent instead.
> For our own implementation purposes, they are equivalent (I think) -
> the shadow root is treated as part of the document, in that the shadow
> nodes see it as an ancestor, but it's transparent when constructing
> the render tree.

Does the shadow root have the bound element as the parent?

If not, then this doesn't sound equivalent.

Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 21:10:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:45 UTC