W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2010

Re: [css3-color] New last call for comments on CSS Color

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:57:35 -0700
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <F41A68AC-DF37-4B1A-911F-3FDDCB8CAF62@apple.com>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
as long as the spec. is clear I am happy. (It might be good to say where HSL is first defined that it's full range, but I leave this to the discretion of the editor)

On Sep 29, 2010, at 6:34 , Chris Lilley wrote:

> Hello www-style,
> 
> Dave Singer wrote:
>> Is the HSL full-range (0-255 luminance) or video-range (16-235 
>> luminance)?  This makes a BIG difference.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0467.html
> 
> I notice that there was no response to this part of your comments. The answer is that the HSL values are full range not video range, as the algorithm 'to translate HSL to RGB' and examples given in section 4.2.4 makes clear.
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-color/Overview.html#hsl-color
> 
> Therefore, no specification change was necessary. Dave, please respond to say that you agree with this conclusion.
> 
> -- 
> Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain                 
> W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
> Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
> Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
> 

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:58:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:31 GMT