W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2010

Re: :invalid

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:19:41 +0200
To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: "Ryan Seddon" <seddon.ryan@gmail.com>, "Mounir Lamouri" <mounir.lamouri@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.vjkz63wp64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:12:59 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> This doesn't really change much, if anything, of my arguments
> previously in the thread though.
>
> At that point why not also add "and is invalid" to the set of
> requirements for matching this new pseduo class and make it actually
> useful in and of itself?

You previously stated that it would be up to the user agent to determine  
when the pseudo-class would match. I do not think that is a good idea. I  
would also like to keep :valid paired with :invalid. Whether we do  
:<x>:invalid or :<x>-invalid/:invalid-<x> I do not really care about.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 25 September 2010 09:20:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:31 GMT