W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Enhancing grouping of selectors

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 09:47:22 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimTFN1051J2FymP6fAFHT9VpM91qTkd01sC2vAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Paul Duffin <pduffin@volantis.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, www-style@w3.org
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:40:33 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
>> It seems to me that the ":not(a), :not(.foo)" meaning is what's meant,
>> though....
>
> Really? I would expect :not(a):not(.foo) personally. Seems more in line with
> how a.foo works (without :not()).

This is probably why it was decided to punt on the issue at the time.  ^_^

~TJ
Received on Sunday, 19 September 2010 16:48:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:31 GMT