W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Enhancing grouping of selectors

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:49:18 +0200
To: "Paul Duffin" <pduffin@volantis.com>, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.vi95wgl464w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:40:33 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> This has been discussed before on the list, as I recall, but one issue  
> was that something like:
>
>    :not(a.foo)
>
> is, at least to some people, ambiguous.  Does it mean
>
>    :not(a):not(.foo)
>
> or does it mean
>
>    :not(a), :not(.foo)
>
> or something else?
>
> It seems to me that the ":not(a), :not(.foo)" meaning is what's meant,  
> though....

Really? I would expect :not(a):not(.foo) personally. Seems more in line  
with how a.foo works (without :not()).


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 19 September 2010 12:49:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:31 GMT