- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:24:30 -0700
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
If we're trying to distinguish linear gradients that have fixed angles from gradients that get their direction from the containing box, we probably need linear-box-gradient linear-enagle-gradient or something like. Or maybe I am missing the point... On Sep 3, 2010, at 10:51 , Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: >>> Glazou reminded me in a tweet of another good reason that we should >>> strive to keep the different-behaving functions separate: the CSS OM. >>> We need to design gradients such that the properties exposed in the OM >>> are sensible, and behave predictably under modification. >> >> That's convincing. We just need a name, then. I'm hoping I can do >> this without resorting to "linear2-gradient()"... > > Maybe just angle-gradient()? Not sure how happy I am with that, but > it's the best I've been able to come up with. > > ~TJ > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Friday, 3 September 2010 18:25:07 UTC