- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:21:33 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 09/01/2010 09:45 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: > In Backgrounds & Borders, we have this about basing the > border-image-width on the border-width: > > <number> > Numbers represent multiples of the corresponding border-width > <http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#the-border-width>.[1] > > Should we also say that if a number is used and the 'border-style' is > 'none' or 'hidden', then the resulting border-image-width is zero? Or > perhaps we should just say "Numbers represent multiples of the computed > value of the corresponding border-width." I think that is the intent, > right? So that layout geometry is the same in the fallback situation? Good catch. Fixed thusly: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/csswg/css3-background/Overview.src.html.diff?r1=1.239&r2=1.240&f=h Let me know if it's good. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 2 September 2010 05:22:09 UTC