W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2010

Re: [css3-writing-modes] a third option for implementing logical properties

From: koba <koba@antenna.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:59:48 +0900
To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org, howcome@opera.com
Message-Id: <20101028195745.46DE.KOBA@antenna.co.jp>

On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:37:32 -0700 (PDT)
John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com> wrote:

> Tokushige Kobayashi wrote:
> > > And calling folks incompetent doesn't help either.
> > 
> > I apologize the point, since my english is very poor.
> I don't think language is the issue, you've made similar statements in
> Japanese repeatedly, including last night:
>   http://twitter.com/TokKoba/status/28772230107
> I think you view this discussion as simply a matter of implementors vs.
> non-implementors and the reason XSL-FO has logical properties and CSS
> doesn't is that too many non-implementors influence CSS specs.  But that's
> a sign of success I think, people want to influence CSS in many
> different ways which often makes it hard to resolve issues.  When anyone
> proposes adding 35 new properties for *any* feature, expect a discussion
> and a lot of people asking if another way would be simpler. 
> That's where the discussion is now.

It seems to me you do not understand Japanese very good.
Your understanding of my tweet is wrong.


Tokushige Kobayashi

小林 徳滋
-- Antenna House, Inc.
E-mail koba@antenna.co.jp
WWW    http://www.antenna.co.jp/  (Japanese)
Blog        http://blog.antenna.co.jp/ILSoft/  (Japanese)
Twitter    @AntennaInfo
WWW    http://www.antennahouse.com/  (English)
TEL    +81-3-5829-9021
FAX    +81-3-5829-9023
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 11:00:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:40 UTC