W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2010

RE: [css3-backgrounds] Should a non-zero border-radius create a new stacking context ?

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:08:02 +0000
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
CC: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E2A52021D@TK5EX14MBXC113.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Bingo. Then I'm happy to leave it be. Thanks !

> -----Original Message-----
> From: L. David Baron [mailto:dbaron@dbaron.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 8:12 AM
> To: Sylvain Galineau
> Cc: robert@ocallahan.org; Brad Kemper; www-style@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [css3-backgrounds] Should a non-zero border-radius create
> a new stacking context ?
> 
> On Tuesday 2010-11-23 14:58 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote:
> > They already have this same side-effect with opacity and
> > transforms. Hence my asking for evidence that it *is* an issue,
> > especially with opacity which is very popular. I'm not that
> > interested in worrying about side-effects if no one runs into them
> > outside test suites.
> 
> Some evidence that authors are confused by the z-ordering behavior
> of opacity:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401682
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573421
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598984
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2837057/what-has-bigger-priority-
> opacity-or-z-index-in-browsers
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2940997/how-to-get-z-index-to-play-
> nice-with-the-jquery-plugin-cycle
> 
> -David
> 
> --
> L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
> Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2010 00:08:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:34 GMT