W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2010

Re: [css3-images] Proposed Gradients changes

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:58:06 +0100
To: "Brad Kemper" <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vmmry4o464w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:49:37 +0100, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>  
> On Nov 23, 2010, at 7:43 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> I have not checked, but is it true that because of this interpolation  
>> CSS gradients are going to work different from <canvas>/SVG gradients?  
>> And if so, is that really a good thing?
> I think it was always the idea to have CSS gradients as a much simpler  
> alternative to SVG gradient syntax, so that if you really needed the  
> extra power you could use SVG. I do think that is a very good thing.

Sorry, I meant whether colors are premultiplied or not. (For some reason I  
thought it was about interpolation.) It's not a syntax issue, but a model  
issue. And I would very much like the model to be shared with SVG/<canvas>  
so we do not need multiple codepaths.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2010 15:58:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:41 UTC