W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2010

Re: [css3-images] Proposed Gradients changes

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 07:49:37 -0800
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D1F28046-D00E-48A0-B2A9-0463D5123941@gmail.com>
To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>

On Nov 23, 2010, at 7:43 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 01:24:10 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 4) Interpolation of gradients has been defined.  I define the
>> constraints that the start and end gradients must satisfy to be
>> interpolable, and then precisely how to interpolate them.
> 
> I have not checked, but is it true that because of this interpolation CSS gradients are going to work different from <canvas>/SVG gradients? And if so, is that really a good thing?

I think it was always the idea to have CSS gradients as a much simpler alternative to SVG gradient syntax, so that if you really needed the extra power you could use SVG. I do think that is a very good thing. 
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2010 15:50:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:34 GMT