W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2010

Re: [css3-2d-transforms] Interop: matrix() values e,f <number> or <length>

From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 16:10:53 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTinc4tv9yuruuEgge+t74TNHUJCG=k1h3+oEezHs@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> Em is not as bad as percentages, since it's only affected by computed font
> style, not geometry.  But yes, rereading the original mail "50%" was a bad
> example, since there are lots of other things that are also not resolvable
> without an element (em, ex, rem, rex, at the very least).

The latest Values and Units draft doesn't seem to have a rex unit, but
ch is also a problem.  Maybe also vh/vw/vm?  I omitted those because
they aren't widely implemented or used yet.
Received on Sunday, 21 November 2010 21:11:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:41 UTC