W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2010

Re: [css3-2d-transforms] Interop: matrix() values e,f <number> or <length>

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:51:16 -0500
Message-ID: <4CE98644.5010108@mit.edu>
To: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
CC: Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/21/10 3:44 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Boris Zbarsky<bzbarsky@mit.edu>  wrote:
>> On 11/19/10 1:26 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
>>> This brings up a glaring problem with CSSMatrix. When you construct one,
>>> it is not associated with any element, so you can't use an element's style
>>> to convert units. Today, when we encounter the above CSSMatrix constructor I
>>> believe we just convert 50% to a value of 50 or something equally arbitrary.
>>> We should probably amend CSSMatrix to allow an element to be passed to the
>>> constructor. This brings up the next sticky issue of what happens when, for
>>> instance, the client size of the element changes. Do values in the CSSMatrix
>>> change? Madness!
>> Agreed.  Why are we allowing percentages here again?  ;)
> Doesn't em cause the same problem?

Em is not as bad as percentages, since it's only affected by computed 
font style, not geometry.  But yes, rereading the original mail "50%" 
was a bad example, since there are lots of other things that are also 
not resolvable without an element (em, ex, rem, rex, at the very least).

Received on Sunday, 21 November 2010 20:51:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:41 UTC