W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2010

Re: [css3-2d-transforms] Should a transformed element reflow its content ?

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:28:16 +1300
Message-ID: <AANLkTimJX_OfafKxqsY1_ynTL9dhgSRkE3qxzM_tQf0+@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, √ėyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>wrote:

> But why would it be any different with overflow:auto ? To oversimplify,
> my expectation is that transforms are applied to the laid-out element
> before it's painted. So if the element does not cause overflow before
> transform, I expect it to look the same after transform whether or not
> the transform is causing the parent to overflow.
>

In Firefox, the post-transform area of an element contributes to the
"scrollable overflow area" of its parent. This allows the user to scroll
transformed objects into view. This seems desirable to me.

Rob
-- 
"Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for
they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures
every day to see if what Paul said was true." [Acts 17:11]
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 03:28:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:34 GMT