W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2010

Re: Flexbox Draft, with pictures!

From: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 15:58:28 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTin4kbo-C851-5QofytQpK0uvOb13e3YwX_IT18e@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:46 PM, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com> wrote:

> (1) I don't think "flex" by itself is a good term for display-inside.  I
> also agree that "box" is arguably too generic.  You might consider just
> combining the words flex and box together.
>
> display: flex-box
> display: inline-flex-box
>
> The same would apply to other properties, e.g., flexbox-begin not
> flex-begin.
>

The original version of Tab's spec used "flexbox". What's you're issue with
just "flex"? flexbox seems redundant to me.
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2010 22:59:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:27 GMT