Re: Flexbox Draft, with pictures!

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:46 PM, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com> wrote:

> (1) I don't think "flex" by itself is a good term for display-inside.  I
> also agree that "box" is arguably too generic.  You might consider just
> combining the words flex and box together.
>
> display: flex-box
> display: inline-flex-box
>
> The same would apply to other properties, e.g., flexbox-begin not
> flex-begin.
>

The original version of Tab's spec used "flexbox". What's you're issue with
just "flex"? flexbox seems redundant to me.