W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2010

Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:27:13 -0800
Message-ID: <4B9033C1.9080706@inkedblade.net>
To: robert@ocallahan.org
CC: Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 03/04/2010 01:23 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com
> <mailto:jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 4 Mar 2010, at 13:30, Christoph Päper wrote:
>      > 6.1 font-kerning: normal | inherit | enabled | disabled
>      >
>      > There are few properties that use generic on/off state names like
>     ‘enabled’ and ‘disabled’. I would prefer not to see more of them,
>     but I do not know which pair of words would be better here, ‘kern’/?
>     perhaps.
>
>     I'd be happy to hear alternative suggestions, although as the draft
>     does not currently include font-kerning as one of the properties
>     controllable via the font shorthand, I don't think the generic
>     "enabled" and "disabled" are particularly problematic here.
>
> How about just naming them 'kerning' and 'no-kerning'? If 'font-kerning:
> kerning' is too weird, perhaps rename 'font-kerning' to
> 'font-glyph-spacing'?

I'd go with font-kerning: normal | kern | no-kern

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2010 22:27:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:25 GMT