W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2010

Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:23:56 +1300
Message-ID: <11e306601003041323t3bb46b00wd80e2f6d9f8929cf@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>wrote:

> On 4 Mar 2010, at 13:30, Christoph Päper wrote:
> > 6.1 font-kerning: normal | inherit | enabled | disabled
> >
> > There are few properties that use generic on/off state names like
> ‘enabled’ and ‘disabled’. I would prefer not to see more of them, but I do
> not know which pair of words would be better here, ‘kern’/? perhaps.
>
> I'd be happy to hear alternative suggestions, although as the draft does
> not currently include font-kerning as one of the properties controllable via
> the font shorthand, I don't think the generic "enabled" and "disabled" are
> particularly problematic here.
>

How about just naming them 'kerning' and 'no-kerning'? If 'font-kerning:
kerning' is too weird, perhaps rename 'font-kerning' to
'font-glyph-spacing'?

Rob
-- 
"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
53:5-6]
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2010 21:24:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:25 GMT