Re: [css3-background] vastly different takes on "blur"

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd still be interested in knowing if people think that a "10px transition
> from 100% opaque to 0% opaque" should be inclusive of a 100% pixel and/or a
> 0% pixel within the 10px. I think here on the list we've be viewing it as
> exclusive of those endpoints.

I consider it exclusive.  I expect a black shadow on white background
to not hit #fff or #000 until just *outside* of the blur area.

~TJ