W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2010

RE: [css3-background] Editorial: at-risk features

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:57:43 +0000
To: Peter Beverloo <peter@lvp-media.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E214E5A15@TK5EX14MBXC120.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Yes. One of the reasons this module came back from CR was to add box-shadow back in so I'm pretty sure this is an error. But a couple of people have already asked me what was up with it so I guess this part of the spec does get read...

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Beverloo [mailto:peter@lvp-media.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 8:05 AM
To: Sylvain Galineau
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Subject: Re: [css3-background] Editorial: at-risk features

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 20:38, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> From the 'Status of this document' section:
>
> "The following features are at-risk and may be dropped at the end of the CR period if there has not been enough interest from implementers: 'box-decoration-break', 'box-shadow'."
>
> I think this list should only include box-decoration-break ?

Purely to emphasise, Presto, WebKit and Gecko have all implemented the box-shadow property, albeit with their vendor prefixes prepended.

Peter
Received on Monday, 21 June 2010 16:58:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:28 GMT