W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2010

Re: Implementation of Inset Box Shadow on image elements

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:45:42 -0700
Message-ID: <4C4F2956.6050701@inkedblade.net>
To: divya manian <divya.manian@gmail.com>
CC: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, " \" <www-style@w3.org>
On 07/27/2010 11:29 AM, divya manian wrote:
>
> The reason I posted here was I think it is practical to have inset
> box-shadow ON TOP OF the image rather than below the image, despite
> what the spec says. I think for image elements inset box-shadow is not
> practical otherwise. inset box-shadow would be of great use if only
> for this issue.
> ...
> My view is, the spec should be altered to allow image  to show below
> an inset box-shadow when an inset box-shadow is specified on the image
> element. There is no use-case for the other case where the inset
> box-shadow is behind the image.

That's an interesting point. Perhaps it makes more sense for the
inset shadow to be on top of the content in *all* cases, not just
for replaced elements?

~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2010 18:46:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:29 GMT