W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2010

Re: Issue 138 proposed text

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:29:02 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTinjtM_zMZLS1H20tNpbPK9exnkf8gT6lpIiwJ8-@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2010, at 5:44 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> When such an inline box is affected by relative
>> positioning, the relative positioning also affects the block box
>> contained in the block box."
>>
>> (The only change is an addition of 5 words at the very end.)
>
> Isn't the second to last word supposed to be "inline"?

...

Yes.

~TJ
Received on Saturday, 17 July 2010 02:29:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:29 GMT