W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2010

Re: [cssom-view] addMediumListener / removeMediumListener

From: Kenneth Christiansen <kenneth.christiansen@openbossa.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:26:11 -0300
Message-ID: <AANLkTilQ7-XGBxmnHdQ48q7GfU8gwUfMKoQSPyAsAxAo@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Luiz Agostini <luiz.agostini@openbossa.org>, www-style@w3.org, marcosc@opera.com
That sounds fine with me. Does any of you other guys disagree with the renaming?

Kenneth

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 19:34:00 +0200, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 5, 2010, at 1:09 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>>
>>> I have been thinking about this some more and I am no longer convinced
>>> the complexity is justified. I think using closures is fine. For other
>>> languages the bindings can be slightly modified to return a token instead or
>>> something. But there's no need to make the ECMAScript variant more complex
>>> as well, especially since not all implementations will have various
>>> languages implementing these bindings, and also since the dominant use of
>>> this API will be in ECMAScript.
>>
>> I'm not keen on having to special-case generated code, and, in WebKit, we
>> compile Objective-C bindings for many of the IDL interfaces, and see people
>> use them fairly extensively in applications that embed WebKit.
>>
>> Can you re-state your proposal so we're all on the same page?
>
> My proposal is that we do the renaming but otherwise keep the specification
> as-is:
>
>  http://dev.w3.org/csswg/cssom-view/#the-stylemedia-interface
>
> Making it more complex just to suit the non-ECMAScript case does not seem
> worth it.
>
>
> --
> Anne van Kesteren
> http://annevankesteren.nl/
>



-- 
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Technical Lead / Senior Software Engineer
Qt Labs Americas, Nokia Technology Institute, INdT
Phone  +55 81 8895 6002 / E-mail kenneth.christiansen at openbossa.org
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 10:26:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:29 GMT