W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2010

Re: [css3-background] Where we are with Blur value discussion

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:37:49 -0700
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100713233749.GA6733@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Tuesday 2010-07-13 16:25 -0700, Brad Kemper wrote:
> I was not the only one to think it should be described in a way
> that was measurable, testable, and author-predictable, and that
> the measure should be visually equal (in some way) to the length
> authored. 

If you want that, the appropriate way to get that is to find out how
existing graphics systems do blurring and describe it using the same
terms already in use, not to invent a new set of terms and a new
mechanism that's different from what existing systems do.

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2010 23:38:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:29 GMT