W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2010

Re: A List Apart: Articles: Prefix or Posthack

From: Eric A. Meyer <eric@meyerweb.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:51:40 -0400
Message-Id: <a0623090ac86168c68fca@[192.168.1.196]>
To: www-style@w3.org
At 5:46 PM -0700 7/12/10, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>On 7/12/10 2:29 PM, Eric A. Meyer wrote:
>>  At 5:32 PM -0700 7/10/10, Brad Kemper wrote:
>>
>>>  On Jul 10, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>>  But while it may not fit everyone everywhere, it still sounds like a
>>>>  reasonable compromise
>>>>  Between 'support forever' and 'take out that prefix asap'.
>>>
>>>  Right. Something in between is fine.
>>
>>  I can agree with that. I'd prefer "forever" for legacy support reasons
>>  but it's not a hill I'd be willing to die upon.
>
>But you and Brad want different things to be supported.  You want 
>support for an alias for the unprefixed property, whereas he wants 
>versioned support of all versions of the prefixed property the 
>browser has implemented.

    If we could settle on one or the other, would that mean we'd 
cleared the last hurdle?  Or even the last major hurdle?

-- 
Eric A. Meyer (eric@meyerweb.com)     http://meyerweb.com/
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2010 00:52:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:29 GMT