- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:56:30 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Jul 6, 2010, at 10:33 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: >> Note that the spec currently says: >> >> "a shorthand property: If all the parts of a shorthand can be animated, then interpolation is performed as if each property was individually specified." >> >> but I don't think this is correct. >> >> The way WebKit implements this is if *any* part of a shorthand can be animated then it will be, and this works both ways. > > I thought we were making all properties animateable, so that > properties that didn't have special animating behavior just > floor/ceiling'd their transition function (I forget which way we > decided right now). > > In that case, the distinction is irrelevant, and in fact the line > itself is no longer needed. I think that's orthogonal to this question. The issue with shorthands, I think, is whether the author expects individual properties to animate when shorthands are used in transition-property, and when the individual properties as changed via shorthand rules. Simon
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2010 05:57:13 UTC