W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2010

Re: [css3-transitions] transitioning a shorthand

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 22:33:06 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikrPJtVino89q4xNzp5E-o7AHfqR41-AR5ph1Wi@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:
> Note that the spec currently says:
> "a shorthand property: If all the parts of a shorthand can be animated, then interpolation is performed as if each property was individually specified."
> but I don't think this is correct.
> The way WebKit implements this is if *any* part of a shorthand can be animated then it will be, and this works both ways.

I thought we were making all properties animateable, so that
properties that didn't have special animating behavior just
floor/ceiling'd their transition function (I forget which way we
decided right now).

In that case, the distinction is irrelevant, and in fact the line
itself is no longer needed.

Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2010 05:33:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 February 2015 12:34:39 UTC