W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2010

Re: [css3-transitions] transitioning a shorthand

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 22:33:06 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikrPJtVino89q4xNzp5E-o7AHfqR41-AR5ph1Wi@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:
> Note that the spec currently says:
>
> "a shorthand property: If all the parts of a shorthand can be animated, then interpolation is performed as if each property was individually specified."
>
> but I don't think this is correct.
>
> The way WebKit implements this is if *any* part of a shorthand can be animated then it will be, and this works both ways.

I thought we were making all properties animateable, so that
properties that didn't have special animating behavior just
floor/ceiling'd their transition function (I forget which way we
decided right now).

In that case, the distinction is irrelevant, and in fact the line
itself is no longer needed.

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2010 05:33:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:29 GMT