W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2010

Re: [css3-images] Resolution (was: 4.3.2 Lengths (reference pixel?))

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:43:55 -0800
Message-Id: <EF373948-AAF3-4B32-992D-36CC5C29F0F4@gmail.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
To: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>


On Dec 16, 2010, at 8:01 AM, Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de> wrote:

> Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>:
> 
>> In what contexts are "pixel size or similar in micrometers or millimeters" used to describe resolution?
> 
> Well, being the reciprocal it’s basically the same expressed differently. “254 DPI” <=> 0.1mm

I understand, but I thought you were saying that it is (or was) common to list it that way, without the "dots per", "pixels per", etc. So I am asking when and where resolution is listed that way. For printers, or what?
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2010 21:44:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:35 GMT