W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2010

Re: [css3-speech] square brackets group

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:09:57 +0100
To: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <hic5g6tc3iqibg8hf47mj8ej2eineamsti@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
* Daniel Weck wrote:
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Jan/0026.html
>
>Dear Bjoern,
>whilst reviewing the status of the CSS3-Speech Module I came across  
>what seems to be an unanswered message from you (at least I can't find  
>any relevant reply in the public mailing-list archive). I realize that  
>you raised your point way back in early 2007, but I might as well  
>address it now ;)
>
>(1) the square bracket notation is used not only in CSS-Speech, but  
>also in other modules, and in fact in CSS 2.1 too (for example [1]).
>
>(2) optionality is represented using a question mark, square bracket  
>is used for grouping.

Yes, but if you consider square brackets to represent grouping, then the
examples in the draft do not match the grammar, `voice-family: male 2`
for instance is not valid because <age> is not optional but omitted in
the example. However, it would match if you read (some of the) square
brackets to represent optionality. I do agree that the Working Group
does not seem to have addressed my comment yet.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Friday, 10 December 2010 23:10:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:35 GMT